Information Processing

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Archive for January 2005

Chilling history

leave a comment »

The following is taken from a comment on my previous post. I guess the election doesn’t mean we are out of the woods yet. Will the US end up with military bases in Iraq, and a friendly government in power? Only time will tell.

U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote :

Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong Terror

by Peter Grose, Special to the New York Times (9/4/1967: p. 2)

WASHINGTON, Sept. 3– United States officials were surprised and heartened today at the size of turnout in South Vietnam’s presidential election despite a Vietcong terrorist campaign to disrupt the voting.

According to reports from Saigon, 83 per cent of the 5.85 million registered voters cast their ballots yesterday. Many of them risked reprisals threatened by the Vietcong.

The size of the popular vote and the inability of the Vietcong to destroy the election machinery were the two salient facts in a preliminary assessment of the nation election based on the incomplete returns reaching here.

Written by infoproc

January 31, 2005 at 4:54 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Successful elections in Iraq

with one comment

Is it too much to hope that this could be a turning point? Let’s hope that, with an estimated 60% turnout, these elections will be as important to Iraq as the Orange revolution to Ukraine.

More questions: Is it just the filtering of Western reporters, or do most people now understand (and demand?) democracy? How does the PRC government present this to their people, who still lack the right to vote?

NYTimes: Far from taking away their instinct for asserting themselves, they seemed to be saying, the humiliations of tyranny had made them hungry for a chance to take a stand.

The point was made by another elderly Shiite, Hachim Shahir, 83, who said he had been a bricklayer for much of his life. Dressed for the occasion in a faded blue blazer, with only frayed ends of cotton where its buttons used to be, and a Bedouin’s black-and-white checkered headdress, he said he could not say exactly what it was about Abdulaziz al-Hakim, the scion of a Shiite religious dynasty, that had made him vote for the United Iraqi Alliance. “How would I know?” he asked. “I cannot read or write.”

But after a pause, he remembered, after all, what had drawn him to the polls, and kept him there for a long time after his two sons, men in their 50’s, had urged him to quit the lengthy lines and go home. “Under Saddam we were a people who were lost”, he said. “Before, we were not able to talk to officials; they were just punching you, and kicking you. But now, with elections, we’ll have good officials. We will know them, and they will know us.”

Written by infoproc

January 31, 2005 at 4:41 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Monkey business

leave a comment »

I can’t think of any clever comments – the research speaks for itself 🙂

“A new study found that male monkeys will give up their juice rewards in order to ogle pictures of female monkey’s bottoms. The way the experiment was set up, the act is akin to paying for the images, the researchers say.

The rhesus macaque monkeys also splurged on photos of top-dog counterparts, the high-ranking primates. Maybe that’s like you or me buying People magazine.

The research, which will be detailed in the March issue of Current Biology, gets more interesting.

The scientists actually had to pay these guys, in the form of extra juice, to get them to look at images of lower-ranking monkeys.

Curiously, the monkeys in the test hadn’t had any direct physical contact with the monkeys in the photos, so they didn’t have personal experience with who was hot and who was not.

“So, somehow, they are getting this information by observation — by seeing other individuals interact,” said Michael Platt of the Duke University Medical Center.” Article

Written by infoproc

January 29, 2005 at 5:26 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Iraqi voting begins abroad

with one comment

I think the war was a mistake – perhaps the greatest strategic blunder of any US president since Vietnam. Nevertheless, I am touched by the sentiments of these Iraqi exiles and Iraqi-Americans as they cast their votes. Cost-benefit analyses aside, I still hope for a better future for Iraq. (From AP.)

Adim Altalibi struggled to hold back tears Friday after voting in an Iraqi election for the first time. All he could think about were his five nephews, all killed under Saddam Hussein’s regime.

“We lost a lot of our young men and women struggling against Saddam Hussein. It’s paid off now,” said Altalibi, 55, an engineer who left Iraq in 1987 and cast his ballot Friday at a suburban Detroit voting site that was once an abandoned home-improvement store.

Isho Mishail, 40, a driving instructor who was voting at the Chicago polling place, said it is important for him to vote because he does not know if his relatives in Iraq will have the same luxury. Insurgents “went to the houses and threatened them, `If you go to the polls, we’ll kill everyone in the house,”’ Mishail said.

…”Ten to 20 years from now, all the generations will remember that this is the first time we practiced our freedom of choice,” said Alshimmari, 49, who worked as a history teacher and was jailed by Saddam before leaving Iraq in 1991.

Written by infoproc

January 28, 2005 at 9:31 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Orange revolution

with 4 comments

More commentary from a Ukrainian friend here.

“I was at a New Year party in Kyiv hosted by a woman-entrepreneur, who co-owns an Italian furniture store in central Kyiv. She told us about her partners from Donetsk (Eastern Ukraine, camp of Yanukovich) who were very surprised that she operates without any “cover” from racketeering gangs. They literally asked her: “So you are living like in Europe?” One should understand — this is a great shift in views on the world, in perception of the reality and social order. Democracy vs Autocracy. Rule of Law vs Rule of Will.”

“Traditional special thanks to CERN physicists Tim Berners-Lee and Robert Cailliau who invented World Wide Web in 1990. Besides commercial and academic benefits for the mankind, WWW elevated freedom of speech to the highest level, unreachable for any government to muzzle the flow of information.

It happened so that Internet editions became the source of information about Yushcneko and Orange revolution for readers in Ukraine and the world as Kuchma’s government controlled all but one TV channels. For example, one of them, maidan.org.ua, served like a newswire from various volunteers all over Kyiv to warm about government moves.

Moreoever, at the peak of tensions, Yanukovich put pressure on Ukrainian Internet providers to block the traffic to opposition websites. One could only regret that the US Congress never found time to consider special proposition of developing the Triangle Boy Web developed at SafeWeb. This would allow democracy idea to beat censorship even further…”

Written by infoproc

January 28, 2005 at 5:43 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

FX roundup

with 11 comments

Comments of Fan Gang, director of the National Economic Research Institute at the China Reform Foundation, at Davos:

“The U.S. dollar is no longer — in our opinion — is no longer a stable currency, and is devaluating all the time, and that’s putting [sic] troubles all the time.”

“So the real issue is how to change the regime from a U.S. dollar pegging … to a more manageable … reference … say Euros, yen, dollars — those kind of more diversified systems.”

“If you do this, in the beginning you have some kind of initial shock,” Fan went on. “You have to deal with some devaluation pressures.”

Keep in mind Fan is not an official spokesperson of the PBOC or the Ministry of Finance. Nevertheless, he represents at least one thread of the internal debate that must be ongoing among Chinese policymakers. The “shock” he refers to will be felt here as a dollar and interest rate crash.

Further analysis and commentary:

Setser blog

Sage Capital Zurich

Written by infoproc

January 27, 2005 at 7:42 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Dark energy

with 4 comments

Below is a figure I stole from Sean Carroll at the University of Chicago. For those who haven’t yet heard, dark energy is a strange substance with negative pressure, whose existence has been recently inferred from cosmological observations. It seems to constitute about 70% of all the energy in the universe, and is causing accelerating expansion. (Don’t worry though – nothing very noticeable will happen for the next few billion years.)

Theorists have no idea what this stuff is. Let me repeat that – theorists have no idea what this stuff is! The discovery, via supernova distance-redshift observations, was totally unexpected. That makes studying it tremendously exciting. However, we may not find out what it is for a long time. For example, dark energy might be a quantum field with very weak interactions, coupled to us only via gravity. In that case we might not learn much beyond how it affects the large scale evolution of the universe.

If the discovery of dark energy holds up, it will be one of the most surprising and important discoveries of the last century. The public hasn’t really caught on to this yet, but who can blame them with all the background noise about speculative (meaning, very likely not real) things like superstrings, extra dimensions, supersymmetric partners, etc.

Written by infoproc

January 27, 2005 at 9:16 am

Posted in Uncategorized